Just had a problem with Firefox crashing out everytime I tried to insert an image into the post. It’s a bit weird as it was working only the other day.
Anyway, a search found that the fault lies with Google Gears. Disabling it fixes the problem.

Just had a problem with Firefox crashing out everytime I tried to insert an image into the post. It’s a bit weird as it was working only the other day.
Anyway, a search found that the fault lies with Google Gears. Disabling it fixes the problem.
At the time of writing this post you’ll probably notice (and it has been there a while) a “ShareThis” option at the bottom of each post and page. This allows readers to share the details on one of many Social Bookmarking sites using the popular ShareThis service (and, as always, other such services exist elsewhere!).
Unfortunately, using a third party such as this does present problems. First of all it’s not the smallest (as in terms of code size and, therefore, the speed of your site) and it does rely heavily on JavaScript, which causes problems if you want to add a share facility in a news feed. They also spend a lot of the time trying to further push their service, adding on facilities you may now want and constantly trying to get the user to sign up. Not only that, but to be all things to all sites, it present a very long list of bookmark possibilities. If anything, this is more than likely going to confuse the amateur user.
And, back to the technical downsides, you’re often reliant on third party apps to provide the bookmarking system on your site, which limits what you can do. Well, it’s either that or learn their API.
The BBC uses it’s own method and that’s to simply present a few of the most popular – it doesn’t use JavaScript, just simple images and links to the resultant bookmarking sites. And, because it doesn’t use JavaScript, you can stick the same details on the bottom of your news feeds. So, you lose access to some of the less popular bookmarking services – is that a great problem? They often come with their own bookmarklets and plugins anyway.
So, over the coming weeks you will find the ShareThis plugin being replaced with seperate bookmarking options. Yes, I will be writing this as a plugin which I will then publish – it will integrate Simple Twitter Link and Simple Facebook Link as well. But I digest…
Here, simply because I had to compile them anyway, are the URLs required for some of the more popular social bookmarking services…
Delicious – http://del.icio.us/post?url=[url]&title=[title]
Digg – http://digg.com/submit?url=[url]&title=[title]
Diigo – http://www.diigo.com/post?url=[url]&title=[title]
Facebook – http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=[url]&t=[title]
Fark – http://cgi.fark.com/cgi/fark/farkit.pl?u=[url]&h=[title]
reddit – http://reddit.com/submit?url=[url]&title=[title]
StumbleUpon – http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit?url=[url]&title=[title]
In all cases, replace [url] with the URL and [title] with, erm, the title.
On January 28th of this year I made available my first WordPress plugin – Simple AdSense Insert. I now have 6 in my portfolio, with another 2 about to be published. And in this short amount of time I’ve already learnt a few things.
To demonstrate my last point, here is a graphical representation of how many people have downloaded my current plugins…

Pretty conclusive. Having said that, some of those result are scewed because of the length of time the plugins have been made available. So let’s change the results to represent the number of downloads over the days the plugin has been available…

Wow, that makes a huge different to my code embed plugin – the only one of the popular ones that isn’t somehow linked to another product.
In this case it’s popular, well, because it’s not linked to another service and it’s filling a role that doesn’t currently exist. When I wanted to put some code into my posts I couldn’t find a plugin to do it. There was one but the author kept the download to his site (if it’s not on the WordPress plugins site it won’t automatically inform you when a new version is available) and insisted on your email address (for sending you emails at a later time all about his other great stuff) before letting you know how to download it.
And this is it – populariting comes through one of two things.
Now all I need to do is think of that one plugin that ticks both boxes. Of course, if you have an idea, I’m happy to hear your views!
A couple of months ago, I talked about improving the search facility built into WordPress. However, soon after, I also mentioned problems I was having with the plugin Search Unleashed.
Sadly the plugin is no better and I’ve had it disabled all this time.
The friend that I originally researched this all for reported, however, that Search Unleashed was not reporting by relevance after all. Since then I’ve seen details on Better Search, an alternative plugin that (supposedly) does provide relevance-based results. I’d try it out and report back back but after my initial activation, I deactivated it again. Rather than build upon your existing search template, it uses its own. So, by default, the search page doesn’t even look like your theme – you have to start the layout, etc, from scratch. That’s not something I’d like to do unless I really wanted to use the plugin. And I’m not that fussed.
But if anybody else does give it a go, please let me know!
Since I’ve started writing WordPress plugins, I’ve had a few questions about them.
These I don’t mind at all and I’m very happy to answer them. However, I’m often limited as to how much help I can give by what details I’m actually sent.
So, to help out, I’ve immediately implemented an attachment feature on the contact page so that you can send me examples of you code – this attachment feature only allows limited size files and only certain extensions. For code, none of these should cause an issue.
Let’s assume you’ve tried one of my plugins and it’s not working properly. In that case I’d need the following…
sidebar.php.Send me this and there’s a good chance the return email from myself will have the answer in it!